(work in progress. For alternative cap enrichement methods see the cap tag page)
Methods papers.
1996: ”Synthesis of high-quality cDNA from nanograms of total or polyA+ RNA with the CapFinder PCR cDNA library construction kit.” Zhu, Y., A. Chenchik and P.D. Siebert. CLONTECHniques 1 1:12-13. Could not find the PDF.
1998: “Generation and use of high-quality cDNA from small amounts of total RNA by SMART PCR” Chenchick and coll., 1998. Oligo-dT-primed total RNA is template-switched with rGrGrG DNA/RNA hybrids. SMART means “Switch Mechanism At the 5′ end of RNA Templates”. Is that the primary paper for SMART ?
In the "CapSelect" method, Schmidt and Mueller, 1999 stimulate template switching with manganese (see below), tail the first-strand cDNAs with dA, and add 5′ linkers with T4 DNA ligase and duplex adapters ending with a (T)TTTGGG overhang.
Noticing that the length of the dC tail on the first-strand cDNA is varialbe, Shi and Kaminskyj (2000) prepared collections of TSOs with variable rG tail length, using TdT.
In SMART (switching mechanism at the 5′ end of the RNA transcript), Zhu, Machleder, Chenchik, Li and Siebert (2001) , first-strand cDNAs are prepared with rGrGrG TSOs containing a SfiIB site and oligo-dT RT primers containing a SfiIA site. Second-strand synthesis with low-cycle PCR, followed with standard cloning methods.
The "terminal continuation" method (Ginsberg et al., 2002, Che et al., 2004) is essentially a template switching with DNA oligonucleotides ending in
CCC
orGGG
.AAA
andTTT
were also tested. An extensive protocol was published in Ginsberg, 2005.In the single-cell tagged reverse transcription (STRT) method, Islam et al, (2011) use template switching and unique molecular identifiers to sequence 5′ ends. The method is oligo-dT-primed.
Mohr et al (2013) have shown (Fig 6) that retroviral RTs can extend a linker with the sequence of a small RNA via a template switching reaction. (That is: a sRNA can play the same role as a TS oligonucleotide.)
in Capture and Amplification by Tailing and Switching (CATS, Turchinovich et al (2014)), short and long RNAs are A-tailed, oligo-dT-primed, and template swiched. A PNK treatement is needed on circulating RNAs, to remove phosphates or cyclophosphates that would prevent the A-tailing.
in nanoPARE (Schon, Kellner and coll.), a template-switching oligonucleotide (RNA-RNA-LNA, without UMIs) is used to add a linker on 5′ ends. After tagmentation, two libraries are amplified: one for 5′ ends and one for RNA-seq. ~15% of the 5′ end alignments have extra Gs, but the genomic distribution is bimodal. Peaks with significant amounts of "extra G" nucleotides are marked as TSS.
?Policastro and coll, 2020 and others before them add the template-switching oligonucleotide after the reverse-transription has been incubated for some time.
Effect of chemical composition of the TS oligonucleotide
Originally, the TSOs were all-RNA. Since this is expensive to synthesise, TSOs where only the last 3 bases are RNA became popular. LNA was also tested as a replacement for RNA.
Chenchick and coll., 1998 reported (rG)n >> rG > dGdGdG >> rUrUrU.
Picelli et al (2013) reported a higher performance for RRL compared to RRR, when preparing Smart-seq2 libraries.
Harbers et al (2013) used the nanoCAGE protocol to compare TSOs ending in RRR, DDD, DDL, DLL or LLL, and reported that only the RRR TSOs had good efficiency (less PCR cycles needed to amplify the cDNAs) and had the lowest amount of strand invastion artefacts.
Arguel et al (2017) reported similar performance for RRR and RRL, using a 5′-focused method similar to nanoCAGE or STRT.
3′ phosphate or biotin blocking groups abolish template-switching (Turchinovich et al (2014) and others). However, Pinto & Lindblad (2010) report the use of a 3′ C3 spacer (on all-DNA TSOs) and Dai and coll. 2020. report successful use of a phosphorylated TSO.
5′ iso-dC and iso-dG prevents reverse-transcriptase to reach the end of the TSO, and therefore blocks concatenation (Kapteyn et al., 2010). This was also used in FFPEcap-seq (Vahrenkamp and coll., 2019).
Effect of TSO concentration
- For the STRT method, Zajac et al (2013) concluded that 1 μM of TSO gave the highest yield.
Effect of magnesium, manganese and dNTP concentrations
Schmidt and Mueller, 1999 showed that increasing magnesium concentration (to 6 mM) or adding manganese at the end of the reaction (1 or 2 mM) increased the frequency of dC addition (moderately for Mg2+ and strongly for Mn2+). Enzyme: SSII; dNTP concentration: 1 mM each. Pinto & Lindblad (2010) also used manganese.
Lee and coll. (2017) increased the efficiency of template switching non-capped molecules by increasing dNTPs to 2 mM and Mg2+ to 9 mM.
Vahrenkamp and coll. (2019) reported that addition of 1 mM manganese increases the formation of TSO concatenates and the fraction of reads aliging to ribosomal sequences.
Related works
- The AMV RT was reported by Ouhammouch and Brody (1992) to template-switch from a mRNA to a plasmid.
Peliska JA, Benkovic SJ.
Biochemistry. 1994 Apr 5;33(13):3890-5 doi:10.1021/bi00179a014
Fidelity of in vitro DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Alex Chenchick, York Y. Shu, Luda Diatchenko, Roger Li, Jason Hill and Paul D. Siebert. (Gene Cloning and Analysis Group, CLONETECH Laboratories, Pao Alto, CA, USA).
In: Gene Cloning and Analysis by RT-PCR. Edited by Paul Siebert and James Larrick. 1998
Generation and use of high-quality cDNA from small amounts of total RNA by SMART PCR.
Reaction mixture: 1 µM RTP; 1 µM TSO; 50–1000 ng total RNA; 2 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTP, 200 U SSII in 10 µL.
DNA/RNA ends tested: HO-G, Cap-G, HO-A, Cap-A, HO-C, Cap-C, HO-T
TSOs tested: rG, rGrG, rGrGrG, rGrGrGrGrG, rUrUrU, GGG, rGrGrG in all-r oligo.
With the wild-type MMLVm the HO-G DNA/RNA duplex is tailed with 1~5 extra nucleotides (Fig 2). Using radiolabelled nucleotides suggests that they are mostly Cs. "Not shown" experiments suggest that the presence of a cap "does not significantly influence the preference of addition of these non-templated nucleotides". The consensus tail is AACCC. SSII (RNAseH-) has a lower efficiency for adding nucleotides, compared with wild-type MMLV.
Template-switching is more efficient with at least 2 rG. dG is notably less efficient and rU has no visible efficiency (Figure 2).
In 2 % of the cDNAs, RT was primed by the TSO.
Poulain S, Arnaud O, Kato S, Chen I, Ishida H, Carninci P, Plessy C.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Feb 6. pii: gkaa079. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa079
Machine-driven parameter screen of biochemical reactions.
Our work using a Labcyte Echo machine to assemble thousands of nanoCAGE reactions.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Oct 25;20(20):5443-50 doi:10.1093/nar/20.20.5443
Ouhammouch M, Brody EN.
Temperature-dependent template switching during in vitro cDNA synthesis by the AMV-reverse transcriptase.
Template switching from a cDNA to a plasmid with the AMV RT.
Shi X, Kaminskyj SG.
Biotechniques. 2000 Dec;29(6):1192-5 doi:10.2144/00296bm07
5' RACE by tailing a general template-switching oligonucleotide.
Biotechniques. 2001 Apr;30(4):892-7.
Zhu YY, Machleder EM, Chenchik A, Li R, Siebert PD.
Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction.
Genome Res. 2019 Oct 24. doi:10.1101/gr.249656.119
Vahrenkamp JM, Szczotka K, Dodson MK, Jarboe EA, Soisson AP, Gertz J.
FFPEcap-seq: a method for sequencing capped RNAs in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples.
Terminator, concatenation blocker, no manganese, indexes. Fails to cite our latest protocol.
Genome Res. 2018 Dec;28(12):1931-1942. doi:10.1101/gr.239202.118
Schon MA, Kellner MJ, Plotnikova A, Hofmann F, Nodine MD.
NanoPARE: parallel analysis of RNA 5' ends from low-input RNA.
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 27;7(1):16327. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16546-4
Hochgerner H, Lönnerberg P, Hodge R, Mikes J, Heskol A, Hubschle H, Lin P, Picelli S, La Manno G, Ratz M, Dunne J, Husain S, Lein E, Srinivasan M, Zeisel A, Linnarsson S.
STRT-seq-2i: dual-index 5' single cell and nucleus RNA-seq on an addressable microwell array.
STRT for the icell8 platform. SSIII better than SSIII with RNA TSO. Optimum: ~2 μM.
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jul 2;11:413. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-413
Kapteyn J, He R, McDowell ET, Gang DR.
Incorporation of non-natural nucleotides into template-switching oligonucleotides reduces background and improves cDNA synthesis from very small RNA samples.
Islam S, Kjällquist U, Moliner A, Zajac P, Fan JB, Lönnerberg P, Linnarsson S.
Genome Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):1160-7. doi:10.1101/gr.110882.110
Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq.
RNA Biol. 2014;11(7):817-28. doi:10.4161/rna.29304
Turchinovich A, Surowy H, Serva A, Zapatka M, Lichter P, Burwinkel B.
Capture and Amplification by Tailing and Switching (CATS). An ultrasensitive ligation-independent method for generation of DNA libraries for deep sequencing from picogram amounts of DNA and RNA.
Lee YH, Hsueh YW, Peng YH, Chang KC, Tsai KJ, Sun HS, Su IJ, Chiang PM.
BMC Biol. 2017 Mar 21;15(1):22. doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0359-5
Low-cell-number, single-tube amplification (STA) of total RNA revealed transcriptome changes from pluripotency to endothelium.
Zhao B, Jin L, Wei J, Ma Z, Jiang W, Ma L, Jin Y.
IUBMB Life. 2012 Jul;64(7):612-6. doi:10.1002/iub.1026
A simple and fast method for profiling microRNA expression from low-input total RNA by microarray.
Genome Biol. 2006;7(3):R18 doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r18
Subkhankulova T, Livesey FJ.
Comparative evaluation of linear and exponential amplification techniques for expression profiling at the single-cell level.
SMART has a much lower false discovery rate (FDR), but compresses the expression ratios.
Methods. 2005 Nov;37(3):229-37 doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.09.003
Ginsberg SD
RNA amplification strategies for small sample populations.
Lab Invest. 2004 Aug;84(8):952-62 doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700110
Ginsberg SD, Che S.
Combined histochemical staining, RNA amplification, regional, and single cell cDNA analysis within the hippocampus.
Peters DG, Kassam AB, Yonas H, O'Hare EH, Ferrell RE, Brufsky AM.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Dec 15;27(24):e39
Comprehensive transcript analysis in small quantities of mRNA by SAGE-lite.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Dec 9. pii: gkw1242. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1242
Arguel MJ, LeBrigand K, Paquet A, Ruiz García S, Zaragosi LE, Barbry P, Waldmann R.
A cost effective 5' selective single cell transcriptome profiling approach with improved UMI design.
Nat Methods. 2015 Sep;12(9):835-7. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3478
Zheng G, Qin Y, Clark WC, Dai Q, Yi C, He C, Lambowitz AM, Pan T.
Efficient and quantitative high-throughput tRNA sequencing.
Fu GK, Wilhelmy J, Stern D, Fan HC, Fodor SP.
Anal Chem. 2014 Mar 18;86(6):2867-70. doi:10.1021/ac500459p
Digital encoding of cellular mRNAs enabling precise and absolute gene expression measurement by single-molecule counting.
Machida RJ, Lin YY.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 8;9(7):e101812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101812
Four methods of preparing mRNA 5' end libraries using the illumina sequencing platform.
Zajac P, Islam S, Hochgerner H, Lönnerberg P, Linnarsson S.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e85270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085270
Base Preferences in Non-Templated Nucleotide Incorporation by MMLV-Derived Reverse Transcriptases.
Harbers M, Kato S, de Hoon M, Hayashizaki Y, Carninici P, Plessy C.
BMC Genomics. 2013 Sep 30;14(1):665.
Comparison of RNA- or LNA-hybrid oligonucleotides in template-switching reactions for high-speed sequencing library preparation.
Picelli S, Björklund AK, Faridani OR, Sagasser S, Winberg G, Sandberg R.
Nat Methods. 2013 Sep 22. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2639
Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells.
Mohr S, Ghanem E, Smith W, Sheeter D, Qin Y, King O, Polioudakis D, Iyer VR, Hunicke-Smith S, Swamy S, Kuersten S, Lambowitz AM.
RNA. 2013 Jul;19(7):958-70. doi: 10.1261/rna.039743.113
Thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase fusion proteins and their use in cDNA synthesis and next-generation RNA sequencing.
Batut P, Dobin A, Plessy C, Carninci P, Gingeras TR.
Genome Res. 2013 Jan;23(1):169-80. doi: 10.1101/gr.139618.112. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
High-fidelity promoter profiling reveals widespread alternative promoter usage and transposon-driven developmental gene expression.
Tang DT, Plessy C, Salimullah M, Suzuki AM, Calligaris R, Gustincich S, Carninci P.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Nov 24. [Epub ahead of print]
Suppression of artifacts and barcode bias in high-throughput transcriptome analyses utilizing template switching.
Ramsköld D, Luo S, Wang YC, Li R, Deng Q, Faridani OR, Daniels GA, Khrebtukova I, Loring JF, Laurent LC, Schroth GP, Sandberg R.
Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jul 22. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2282.
Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells.
Bontoux N, Dauphinot L, Vitalis T, Studer V, Chen Y, Rossier J, Potier MC.
Lab Chip. 2008 Mar;8(3):443-50
Integrating whole transcriptome assays on a lab-on-a-chip for single cell gene profiling.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30794. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
Highly parallel genome-wide expression analysis of single Mammalian cells.
Fan JB, Chen J, April CS, Fisher JS, Klotzle B, Bibikova M, Kaper F, Ronaghi M, Linnarsson S, Ota T, Chien J, Laurent LC, Nisperos SV, Chen GY, Zhong JF.
Che S, Ginsberg SD.
Lab Invest. 2004 Jan;84(1):131-7.
Amplification of RNA transcripts using terminal continuation.
Templates switching with a DNA oligonucleotide ending in a mixture of Gs and Cs.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9677-86
Clark JM
Novel non-templated nucleotide addition reactions catalyzed by procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases.
Oz-Gleenberg I, Herschhorn A, Hizi A.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Feb;39(3):1042-53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq786
Reverse transcriptases can clamp together nucleic acids strands with two complementary bases at their 3'-termini for initiating DNA synthesis.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Mar 15;27(6):1558-60.
Matz M, Shagin D, Bogdanova E, Britanova O, Lukyanov S, Diatchenko L, Chenchik A.
Amplification of cDNA ends based on template-switching effect and step-out PCR.
To counter template-switching happening from inside the oligonucleotide instead of its tail.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Nov 1;27(21):e31.
Schmidt WM, Mueller MW.
CapSelect: a highly sensitive method for 5' CAP-dependent enrichment of full-length cDNA in PCR-mediated analysis of mRNAs.
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Apr;18(4):457-9 doi:10.1038/74546
Wang E, Miller LD, Ohnmacht GA, Liu ET, Marincola FM.
High-fidelity mRNA amplification for gene profiling.
Neurochem Res. 2002 Oct;27(10):981-92
Ginsberg SD, Che S.
RNA amplification in brain tissues.
SMART amplification with less than 50 ng material, but primes with oligo dT.
Dai ZM, Zhu XJ, Chen Q, Yang WJ.
J Biotechnol. 2007 Feb 20;128(3):435-43. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.10.018
PCR-suppression effect: kinetic analysis and application to representative or long-molecule biased PCR-based amplification of complex samples.
“The 10 µl final [RT] reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris–Cl (pH 8.3 at 25°C), 75 mM KCl,6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.2 mg/ml BSA, 10 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTPs, 1µM TS-oligo, 1µM oligo(dT) adaptor (, 10 U RNase Inhibitor, and 150 U SuperScript II [and] was incubated at 42 °C for 1 h, followed by 45 °C for 30 min, and 50 °C for 10 min.”
“Using [...] the shortest adaptor, whose length is equal to [the PCR primer], short fragments corresponding to 0.25 kb were efficiently amplified, while longer fragments (>3.5 kb) could not be distinguished from the background. Using [...] the longest adaptor, whose length is more than twice [the PCR primer], fragments shorter than 1.5 kb were suppressed, while fragments up to 10 kb were efficiently amplified.” [My comment: this analysis does not take into account the overall reduction of PCR efficiency with increasing and the fact that mass of shortest fragments were also lower in the GeneRuler ladder. This also contributes to the disappearance of these bands on the electrophoresis pictures. This might explain why the high-length fragments could not resolve in the amplifications with highest yields.]
“Lower [annealing temperature] enhanced the PS-effect under any condition. [Annealing temperature] greatly affected the PS-effect when the primer concentration was low (P2 = 0.04M). [The] average length of the products was longer at lower [annealing temperature]. [...] From 50 to 61.2°C), longer products (up to 10 kb) wer eefficiently amplified. When [annealing temperature] was higher (>65.9°C), much shorter products (<4 kb) were efficiently amplified and longer products disappeared. [Annealing temperature] also affected the PS-effect when primer concentration was 15-fold higher [...] The average product length between higher (70◦C) and lower (60◦C) [annealing temperature] was significantly different, regardless of adaptors used.”
“[Only] with the longest adaptor [...] we were able to amplify products in a wide range (from 0.25 to 10 kb) simultaneously with a slight over-representation of longer molecules. [To] representatively amplify a complex sample, relatively long ITR (compared to primer length), high [annealing temperature], and high concentratio nof primer should be used.”
Morin R, Bainbridge M, Fejes A, Hirst M, Krzywinski M, Pugh T, McDonald H, Varhol R, Jones S, Marra M.
Biotechniques. 2008 Jul;45(1):81-94. doi:10.2144/000112900
Profiling the HeLa S3 transcriptome using randomly primed cDNA and massively parallel short-read sequencing.
Anal Biochem. 2010 Feb 15;397(2):227-32. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.022
Pinto FL, Lindblad P.
A guide for in-house design of template-switch-based 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends systems.