The reverse transcriptase
(redaction in progress)
Additives that increase reaction performance
- Actinomycin D (Perocchi et al., 2007).
- T4 bacteriophage gene 32 protein (T4gp32, Kenzelmann et al. , 2004, Piché et al. , 2005).
DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity
- It is utilised in template switching methods to add linkers to first-strand cDNAs.
- It is also a source of antisense artefacts when the RT makes a second-strand cDNA that is mistaken for a first-strand cDNA. ActinomycinD inhibits DNA-dependent, but not RNA-dependent polymerase activity and is used to suppress these artefacts (Perocchi et al., 2007, Kanamori-Katayama et al., 2011).
- Its error profile is different from other DNA polymerases (de Paz et al., 2018).
Clamping activity
- Reverse transcriptases can bind duplexes that are only annealed through a 2-nt homology. A single nucleotide is not enough and GC-rich sequences are strongly favoured. This binding is enhanced by dGTP. The assays demonstrating this used an ELISA approach (Oz-Gleenberg, Herschhorn and Hizi, 2011).
Terminal desoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) activity
Like other DNA polymerases (Clark, 1988), reverse transcriptases have a TdT activity.
Choice of the assay for studying TdT activity can strongly influence the results. For instance, Pelisca and Benkovic, 1994 showed strong discrepancy between radiolabelled primer extension assay and sequencing cDNAs that have been further extended. They suppose that differential tolerance of RT to mismatches can be the explanation.
Peliska and Benkovic, 1992 showed that HIV-1 RT adds one nucleotide on non-capped oligonucleotide duplexes. A > G > T > C ratio: 1 : 0.5 : 0.2 : 0.07. Addition of subsequent bases is visible but much slower.
Patel & Preston, 1994 showed that HIV RT adds one nucleotide (A > G >> T|C) on DNA/DNA duplexes, and more on DNA/RNA duplexes. Addition is favoured by increased dNTP levels. MMLV and AMV were also reported (data not shown) to add multiple nucleotides.
Chen & Patton, 2001 reported a TdT activity for MMLV and AMV, with a preference for adding As. For MMLV, activity reduced abruptly between 45 and 50 °C. For AMV, it decreased constantly from 25 to 50 °C. Activity increased with concentration for MMLV. (High-concentration AMV was not available.)
Oz-Gleenberg et al, 2011 showed that the the reverse transcriptase of the long terminal repeat retrotransposon Tf1, like other DNA polymerases, also adds non-templated As to blunt DNA duplexes.
Mohr and coll, 2013 showed that the Thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase also adds non-templated As.
Bhardwaj and coll, 2020 report a reverse-transcription with very low G-addition.
Templated TdT activity
Surprisingly, reverse transcriptases can also extend cDNAs using a single nucleotide as a template.
Following an initial observation of Clark et al (1987) on the Klenow fragment, Ohtsubo et al, 2017a showed that specific tailing is enhanced by the complementary dNMP (C enhanced by dGMP, etc.), except for A-tailing, which is already the strongest.
Other nucleotides than dNMPs can enhance tailing. In particular, rA, dA, dG and dC potently induce tailing, and GMP, GDP and CDP induce continuous tailing when longer reaction times are allowed (Ohtsubo et al., 2017b).
Reverse-transcription of the 5′ cap.
Pro:
Hirzmann et al., 1993 observed the presence of an extra G at the 5′ end of cDNA clones, and concluded that the cap can be reverse-transcribed. They supported their conclusion with molecular modelling.
Volloch, Schweitzer and Rits, 1995 showed that the AMV reverse-transcribes the cap, using an assay where the extension of a natural hairpin in the beta-globin cDNA can be enabled by decapping.
Kulpa, Topping and Telesnitsky, 1997 noted the addition of one G at the position where the 5′ end of the MMLV RNA was reverse-transcribed, with a frequency of 10 %. They also discussed if it could be that the cap was reverse-transcribed.
Schmidt & Mueller, 1999 showed that extra cytosine are more frequently added in presence of the 5′ cap.
Ohtake et al, 2004 synthethised RNAs with A-caps and showed that they are reverse-transcribed as Ts.
Lavie et al, 2004 found extra Gs at the ends of genomic sequences of retrotransposons, showing that endogenous reverse-transcriptases also reverse-transcribe the cap.
Zhang et al, 2017 published a structure of an RNA-GpppG complex that suggests that a m7GpppNm / DNA duplex could form during the reverse-transcription of the cap.
Con:
Chenchick and coll., 1998 reported that non-capped oligonucleotides were extended with long (1~5) cytosine tails, and that the presene of a cap did not have a “significant influence”.
In Dallmeier and Neyts, 2013, where first-strand cDNAs prepared with a phosphorylated reverse-transcription primer were circularised, amplified and sequenced, there is not visible evidence for G addition.
Reverse-transcriptases tolerate terminal mismatches
- HIV-1 RT can extend A-mismatches with various efficiencies: A:C >> A:A > A:G (Perrino and coll., 1898).
- Reported by Mizuno et al., 1999 for double-mismatches and MMLV.
- Utilised in Arnaud et al., 2016 to reduce priming or ribosomal or hemoglobin RNA.
- Specificity of RT nevertheless increases with reaction temperature. For instance, Xu and coll., 2019 increased it from ~30 % at 47 °C to ~75 % at 55 °C.
Reverse-transcription primers
- "N15" random pentadecamers: Stangegaard et al., 2006.
- Multi-targeted primers (MTP): Adomas et al., 2010.
- "Not-so random" (NSR) primers: Armour et al., 2009.
- "Pseudo-random" primers: Arnaud et al., 2016.
Reverse-transcriptase point mutations
- E69K, E302R, W313F, L435G and N454K collectively increase the half-life of MMLV RT at 55 °C (Arezi and Hogrefe, 2009).
- D200N, L603W, T330P, L139P and E607K (not read, Baranauskas and coll., 2012).
Xiang CC, Chen M, Ma L, Phan QN, Inman JM, Kozhich OA, Brownstein MJ.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 May 1;31(9):e53. doi:10.1093/nar/gng053
A new strategy to amplify degraded RNA from small tissue samples for microarray studies.
Bhardwaj V, Semplicio G, Erdogdu NU, Manke T, Akhtar A.
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 30;10(1):3219. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11115-x
MAPCap allows high-resolution detection and differential expression analysis of transcription start sites.
Reports that in their reverse-transcription reaction, G-addition is very low.
RT reaction in 20 µL: 10x Buffer 2 μL; dNTP (10 mM) 1 μL → 500 µM final; MgCl2 (25 mM) 4 μL → 5 mM final; DTT (0.1 M) 2 μL → 10 mM final; RNaseOUT (40 U/μl) 1 μL; SSIII (200 U/μL) 1 μL
Peliska JA, Benkovic SJ.
Biochemistry. 1994 Apr 5;33(13):3890-5 doi:10.1021/bi00179a014
Fidelity of in vitro DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Science. 1992 Nov 13;258(5085):1112-8 doi:10.1126/science.1279806
Peliska JA, Benkovic SJ.
Mechanism of DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Volloch VZ, Schweitzer B, Rits S.
DNA Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;14(12):991-6 doi:10.1089/dna.1995.14.991
Transcription of the 5'-terminal cap nucleotide by RNA-dependent DNA polymerase: possible involvement in retroviral reverse transcription.
Alex Chenchick, York Y. Shu, Luda Diatchenko, Roger Li, Jason Hill and Paul D. Siebert. (Gene Cloning and Analysis Group, CLONETECH Laboratories, Pao Alto, CA, USA).
In: Gene Cloning and Analysis by RT-PCR. Edited by Paul Siebert and James Larrick. 1998
Generation and use of high-quality cDNA from small amounts of total RNA by SMART PCR.
Reaction mixture: 1 µM RTP; 1 µM TSO; 50–1000 ng total RNA; 2 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTP, 200 U SSII in 10 µL.
DNA/RNA ends tested: HO-G, Cap-G, HO-A, Cap-A, HO-C, Cap-C, HO-T
TSOs tested: rG, rGrG, rGrGrG, rGrGrGrGrG, rUrUrU, GGG, rGrGrG in all-r oligo.
With the wild-type MMLVm the HO-G DNA/RNA duplex is tailed with 1~5 extra nucleotides (Fig 2). Using radiolabelled nucleotides suggests that they are mostly Cs. "Not shown" experiments suggest that the presence of a cap "does not significantly influence the preference of addition of these non-templated nucleotides". The consensus tail is AACCC. SSII (RNAseH-) has a lower efficiency for adding nucleotides, compared with wild-type MMLV.
Template-switching is more efficient with at least 2 rG. dG is notably less efficient and rU has no visible efficiency (Figure 2).
In 2 % of the cDNAs, RT was primed by the TSO.
Dallmeier K, Neyts J.
Anal Biochem. 2013 Mar 1;434(1):1-3. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2012.10.031
Simple and inexpensive three-step rapid amplification of cDNA 5' ends using 5' phosphorylated primers.
EMBO J. 1997 Feb 17;16(4):856-65 doi:10.1093/emboj/16.4.856
Kulpa D, Topping R, Telesnitsky A.
Determination of the site of first strand transfer during Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcription and identification of strand transfer-associated reverse transcriptase errors.
Baranauskas A, Paliksa S, Alzbutas G, Vaitkevicius M, Lubiene J, Letukiene V, Burinskas S, Sasnauskas G, Skirgaila R.
Protein Eng Des Sel. 2012 Oct;25(10):657-68 doi:10.1093/protein/gzs034
Generation and characterization of new highly thermostable and processive M-MuLV reverse transcriptase variants.
Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):55-58. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0258-x
Xu H, Fair BJ, Dwyer ZW, Gildea M, Pleiss JA.
Detection of splice isoforms and rare intermediates using multiplexed primer extension sequencing.
Specificity of RT priming can be increased by increasing temperature from 47 °C to 55 °C.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 27;46(13):e78. doi:10.1093/nar/gky296
de Paz AM, Cybulski TR, Marblestone AH, Zamft BM, Church GM, Boyden ES, Kording KP, Tyo KEJ
High-resolution mapping of DNA polymerase fidelity using nucleotide imbalances and next-generation sequencing
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jul 2;11:413. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-413
Kapteyn J, He R, McDowell ET, Gang DR.
Incorporation of non-natural nucleotides into template-switching oligonucleotides reduces background and improves cDNA synthesis from very small RNA samples.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6520. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04765-8
Ohtsubo Y, Nagata Y, Tsuda M.
Compounds that enhance the tailing activity of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase.
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 2;7:41769. doi:10.1038/srep41769
Ohtsubo Y, Nagata Y, Tsuda M.
Efficient N-tailing of blunt DNA ends by Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 18;91(2):549-53 doi:10.1073/pnas.91.2.549
Patel PH & Preston BD.
Marked infidelity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase at RNA and DNA template ends.
Biotechniques. 2001 Mar;30(3):574-80, 582
Chen D, Patton JT.
Reverse transcriptase adds nontemplated nucleotides to cDNAs during 5'-RACE and primer extension.
Arnaud O, Kato S, Poulain S, Plessy C.
Biotechniques. 2016 Apr 1;60(4):169-74. doi:10.2144/000114400
Targeted reduction of highly abundant transcripts using pseudo-random primers.
Lee YH, Hsueh YW, Peng YH, Chang KC, Tsai KJ, Sun HS, Su IJ, Chiang PM.
BMC Biol. 2017 Mar 21;15(1):22. doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0359-5
Low-cell-number, single-tube amplification (STA) of total RNA revealed transcriptome changes from pluripotency to endothelium.
Chen Y, Zhong JF.
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;438:293-303. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-133-8_22
Microfluidic devices for high-throughput gene expression profiling of single hESC-derived neural stem cells.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Mar 1;29(5):E29
Baugh LR, Hill AA, Brown EL, Hunter CP.
Quantitative analysis of mRNA amplification by in vitro transcription.
J Biomol Tech. 2005 Sep;16(3):239-47
Piché C, Schernthaner JP.
Optimization of in vitro transcription and full-length cDNA synthesis using the T4 bacteriophage gene 32 protein.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(19):e128 doi:10.1093/nar/gkm683
Perocchi F, Xu Z, Clauder-Münster S, Steinmetz LM.
Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Sep 6;45(15):9046-9058. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx633
Agudo R, Calvo PA, Martínez-Jiménez MI, Blanco L.
Engineering human PrimPol into an efficient RNA-dependent-DNA primase/polymerase.
J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 15;20(2):579-88.
Tkatch T, Baranauskas G, Surmeier DJ.
Kv4.2 mRNA abundance and A-type K(+) current amplitude are linearly related in basal ganglia and basal forebrain neurons.
Zhang J1, Byrne CD.
Biochem J. 1999 Jan 15;337 ( Pt 2):231-41. doi:10.1042/bj3370231
Differential priming of RNA templates during cDNA synthesis markedly affects both accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative competitive reverse-transcriptase PCR.
Nat Methods. 2015 Sep;12(9):835-7. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3478
Zheng G, Qin Y, Clark WC, Dai Q, Yi C, He C, Lambowitz AM, Pan T.
Efficient and quantitative high-throughput tRNA sequencing.
Cozen AE, Quartley E, Holmes AD, Hrabeta-Robinson E, Phizicky EM, Lowe TM.
Nat Methods. 2015 Sep;12(9):879-84. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3508
ARM-seq: AlkB-facilitated RNA methylation sequencing reveals a complex landscape of modified tRNA fragments.
Ruprecht RM, Goodman NC, Spiegelman S.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Jan 19;294(2):192-203.
Conditions for the selective synthesis of DNA complementary to template RNA.
Lekanne Deprez RH, Fijnvandraat AC, Ruijter JM, Moorman AF.
Anal Biochem. 2002 Aug 1;307(1):63-9.
Sensitivity and accuracy of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using SYBR green I depends on cDNA synthesis conditions.
Taggart AJ, DeSimone AM, Shih JS, Filloux ME, Fairbrother WG.
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Jun 17;19(7):719-21. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2327
Large-scale mapping of branchpoints in human pre-mRNA transcripts in vivo.
Zajac P, Islam S, Hochgerner H, Lönnerberg P, Linnarsson S.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e85270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085270
Base Preferences in Non-Templated Nucleotide Incorporation by MMLV-Derived Reverse Transcriptases.
Mohr S, Ghanem E, Smith W, Sheeter D, Qin Y, King O, Polioudakis D, Iyer VR, Hunicke-Smith S, Swamy S, Kuersten S, Lambowitz AM.
RNA. 2013 Jul;19(7):958-70. doi: 10.1261/rna.039743.113
Thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase fusion proteins and their use in cDNA synthesis and next-generation RNA sequencing.
Oz-Gleenberg I, Herzig E, Hizi A.
FEBS J. 2012 Jan;279(1):142-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08406.x
Template-independent DNA synthesis activity associated with the reverse transcriptase of the long terminal repeat retrotransposon Tf1.
Reverse-transcriptases, add non-templated As to blunt DNA duplexes.
Bengtsson M, Hemberg M, Rorsman P, Ståhlberg A.
BMC Mol Biol. 2008 Jul 17;9:63.
Quantification of mRNA in single cells and modelling of RT-qPCR induced noise.
Clin Chem. 2004 Sep;50(9):1678-80.
Ståhlberg A, Kubista M, Pfaffl M.
Comparison of reverse transcriptases in gene expression analysis.
Küpfer PA, Leumann CJ.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov 1;39(21):9422-32.
Synthesis, base pairing properties and trans-lesion synthesis by reverse transcriptases of oligoribonucleotides containing the oxidatively damaged base 5-hydroxycytidine.
Suslov O, Steindler DA.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Nov 27;33(20):e181.
PCR inhibition by reverse transcriptase leads to an overestimation of amplification efficiency.
Thermocycled reaction with Tween; capture efficiency aroung 5%.
“150 Hz resulted in a simple vortex pattern […] inside PCR vials.”
Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9677-86
Clark JM
Novel non-templated nucleotide addition reactions catalyzed by procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases.
J Biosci Bioeng. 2005 Mar;99(3):293-5. doi:10.1263/jbb.99.293
Nakano M, Nakai N, Kurita H, Komatsu J, Takashima K, Katsura S, Mizuno A.
Single-molecule reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using water-in-oil emulsion.
Oz-Gleenberg I, Herschhorn A, Hizi A.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Feb;39(3):1042-53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq786
Reverse transcriptases can clamp together nucleic acids strands with two complementary bases at their 3'-termini for initiating DNA synthesis.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Nov 1;27(21):e31.
Schmidt WM, Mueller MW.
CapSelect: a highly sensitive method for 5' CAP-dependent enrichment of full-length cDNA in PCR-mediated analysis of mRNAs.
Kenzelmann M, Klären R, Hergenhahn M, Bonrouhi M, Gröne HJ, Schmid W, Schütz G.
Genomics. 2004 Apr;83(4):550-8 doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.09.026
High-accuracy amplification of nanogram total RNA amounts for gene profiling.
Augment temperature, lower primer concentration, and add T4gp32 to enhance reverse transcription.
DNA Res. 2004 Aug 31;11(4):305-9
Ohtake H, Ohtoko K, Ishimaru Y, Kato S.
Determination of the capped site sequence of mRNA based on the detection of cap-dependent nucleotide addition using an anchor ligation method.
Lavie L, Maldener E, Brouha B, Meese EU, Mayer J.
Genome Res. 2004 Nov;14(11):2253-60 doi:10.1101/gr.2745804
The human L1 promoter: variable transcription initiation sites and a major impact of upstream flanking sequence on promoter activity.
Biotechniques. 2006 May;40(5):649-57.
Stangegaard M, Dufva IH, Dufva M.
Reverse transcription using random pentadecamer primers increases yield and quality of resulting cDNA.
Almost 100% of the RNA molecules are primed (using massive amounts of oligonucleotides).
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(17):4702-10. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl625
Leal NA, Sukeda M, Benner SA.
Dynamic assembly of primers on nucleic acid templates.
MMuLV reverse-transcriptase can not use 5′ NH₂ 8-mers for DNA-dependant DNA polymerisation.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(21):e143 doi:10.1093/nar/gkl740
Hartmann CH, Klein CA.
Gene expression profiling of single cells on large-scale oligonucleotide arrays.
High concentration of a dT and random primers mix in reverse transcription.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Feb;37(2):473-81. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn952
Arezi B, Hogrefe H.
Novel mutations in Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase increase thermostability through tighter binding to template-primer.
Armour CD, Castle JC, Chen R, Babak T, Loerch P, Jackson S, Shah JK, Dey J, Rohl CA, Johnson JM, Raymond CK.
Nat Methods. 2009 Sep;6(9):647-9. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1360
Digital transcriptome profiling using selective hexamer priming for cDNA synthesis.
Because of reduced complexity, many 5′ ends are difficult to cover.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 25;21(15):3597-8
Hirzmann J, Luo D, Hahnen J, Hobom G.
Determination of messenger RNA 5'-ends by reverse transcription of the cap structure.
“poly(A)+ RNA was obtained using Hybond-mAP paper (Amersham). 1 µg of poly(A)+ -RNA in 9.65 µL of water was heated to 60°C for 3 min, cooled on ice, added to 4 µL of 5 × RT buffer (1 × RT buffer is 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 5 mM MgCl2, 40 mM KCl, 2 mM DTE), 3 µL dNTPs (10 mM each), 0.25 µL (10 units) of RNasin (Promega), 2.5 µL of XhoI-(dT)17 oligonucleotide primer (300 pmol, 0.5 µg/µL). and 0.6 µL (16 units) of avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase (Boehringer). The reaction was continued at 42 °C for 2 hours, and excess XhoI-(dT)17 primer and substrates were removed by glass powder purification followed by ethanol precipitation.”
Mizuno Y, Carninci P, Okazaki Y, Tateno M, Kawai J, Amanuma H, Muramatsu M, Hayashizaki Y.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Mar 1;27(5):1345-9.
Increased specificity of reverse transcription priming by trehalose and oligo-blockers allows high-efficiency window separation of mRNA display.
Reverse transcriptase can prime when the last two bases mismatch.